top of page
Aegis Adjusters Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Real Property Insurance Claim Outcomes Across Illinois

Property insurance claims are not always resolved at the initial estimate. Many disputes in Illinois involve valuation, scope, repairability, or material matching — not coverage denial.

​

Below are documented examples of residential and commercial property claims where additional inspection, supplemental documentation, or formal dispute resolution led to materially different outcomes.

​​

Hail Damage Roof Claim – Roselle, Illinois

 
📍 Loss Overview

  • Location: Roselle, Cook County, IL

  • Type of Loss: Hail Damage

  • Property Type: Multi-Tenant Retail Building

  • Initial Carrier Payment: $56,827.86

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

"Hail impact damage to modified bitumen roofing with reflective silver coating documented during reinspection in Roselle, IL."

 

​

​

🔎 The Carrier’s Position

The insurer acknowledged that hail impacted the roof but did not agree with the extent of damage attributed to the storm.

​

The carrier concluded that the roof sustained limited damage and issued payment for isolated repairs rather than full replacement.

​

The position taken was that the roofing system remained serviceable and that spot shingle replacement would adequately address the loss.

 

⚖️ The Dispute

The central dispute was not whether hail occurred — it was whether the hail caused functional damage to the roofing system.

​

Upon further evaluation, the roof exhibited:

​

  • Widespread bruising consistent with hail impact

  • Compromised mat structure in multiple slopes

  • Reduced water-shedding capability in damaged areas

​

In this case, the evidence supported that the roofing system had been materially affected by hail and that isolated repairs would not restore uniform performance, durability, or expected service life.

 

🧾 Our Approach

  • Retained an independent engineering professional to evaluate the roofing system

  • Conducted a joint inspection to assess hail impact and functional damage

  • Documented membrane compromise and coating displacement

  • Evaluated repairability versus full system restoration

  • Submitted engineering findings in support of proper scope and valuation

 

The focus was not speculation — it was technical evaluation of whether the roofing system had been functionally damaged by hail and whether repair would restore it to its pre-loss condition.

 

💰 Final Outcome

  • Revised Settlement: $723,387.74

  • Result: Full roof replacement approved

 

The dispute ultimately centered on the extent of hail-related damage and proper valuation of the roofing system.

​

Once supported by engineering documentation, the scope was revised to reflect full replacement rather than limited repair.​​​​

Wind Damage Roof Claim – Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
📍 Loss Overview

  • Location: Elk Grove Village, IL

  • Property Type: Commercial

  • Roof Type: Flat Roof System

  • Type of Loss: Wind

  • Initial Carrier Payment: $16,883.04

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
​
​
​
 
​Wind-damaged flat roof in Elk Grove Village, IL showing moisture intrusion and saturated insulation during inspection.
 
​
​
🔎 The Carrier’s Position

The insurer acknowledged wind-related damage to portions of the roofing system.

 

Payment was issued in the amount of $16,883.04 for limited repairs.

 

The carrier maintained that the roof was repairable and that full replacement was not warranted.

 
⚖️ The Dispute

During further evaluation, significant moisture intrusion was identified within the roofing assembly.

​

Testing and inspection revealed:

  • Water-saturated insulation

  • Loss of thermal integrity

  • Compromised structural performance of underlying components

 

Although the carrier’s retained engineer agreed that the insulation was saturated with water, the scope remained limited to partial repair.

​

The central issue became whether a roofing system containing saturated insulation could be selectively repaired — or whether full replacement was required to properly restore the property.

 
🧾 Our Approach

  • Conducted moisture testing and documentation of insulation saturation

  • Reviewed applicable building code requirements

  • Demonstrated that roofing systems must be installed over dry, uncompromised insulation

  • Explained that saturated insulation cannot remain in place under a repaired membrane

  • Submitted formal documentation supporting full system replacement

 

Once code compliance requirements were clearly established, the scope was reevaluated.

 
💰 Final Outcome

  • Initial Payment: $16,883.04

  • Final Settlement: $259,535.67

  • Result: Full roof replacement approved

 

The issue was not whether wind caused damage.

​

The issue was whether a roofing system with saturated insulation could be restored through partial repair while remaining code compliant.

​

After further review, the claim was resolved to reflect full system replacement.

Hail Damage Roof Claim – Homer Glen, Illinois

 
📍 Loss Overview

  • Location: Homer Glen, Will County, IL

  • Type of Loss: Hail Damage

  • Property Type: Residential

  • Initial Carrier Payment: $33,713.76

​​

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

"Aged cedar shake roofing system showing brittleness and surface deterioration during repairability evaluation in Will County, Illinois."

 

​

​

🔎 The Carrier’s Position

The insurer acknowledged hail damage to the metal components of the roof, including valleys and flashings.

​

The carrier also approved limited shake replacement in isolated areas surrounding the metal impacts.

​

The position taken was that the cedar shake roof was largely repairable and that replacing select damaged shakes would adequately address the loss.

​

Payment was issued for:

  • Metal component replacement

  • Spot shake repairs in affected areas

 

The carrier maintained that full roof replacement was not necessary.

 

⚖️ The Dispute

The central issue was repairability.

​

The cedar shake roof had significant age-related deterioration, including:

  • Surface checking and splitting

  • Brittle shake edges

  • Fastener fatigue

  • Weathered and oxidized wood fibers

 

Attempting to remove and replace individual shakes would result in collateral breakage beyond the originally identified hail impacts.

​

Due to the condition and age of the roof, selective repairs could not be performed without causing additional damage to surrounding shakes.

​

The question became whether partial repair would restore the roof to its pre-loss condition — or whether the system, as a whole, was no longer reasonably repairable.

​

In this case, the roof’s age and brittleness made spot repair impractical and functionally insufficient.

 

🧾 Our Approach

  • Conducted detailed hands-on inspection of shake condition

  • Documented brittleness and breakage during test lift

  • Evaluated fastener integrity and removal impact

  • Assessed feasibility of isolating repairs without collateral damage

  • Submitted documentation supporting non-repairability

 

The evaluation focused on whether the roof could be repaired without materially altering surrounding components or shortening remaining service life.

 

💰 Final Outcome

  • Revised Settlement: $91,093.36

  • Result: Full cedar shake roof replacement approved

 

The issue was not whether hail occurred.

​

The issue was whether a weathered cedar shake system of this age could be selectively repaired without causing additional damage.

​

Once repairability was properly evaluated, the scope was revised accordingly.

Hail Damage Roof Claim – Bartlett, Illinois

 
📍 Loss Overview

  • Location: Bartlett, Cook County, IL

  • Property Type: Church / Religious Facility

  • Roof Type: Asphalt Shingle

  • Type of Loss: Hail

  • Initial Carrier Payment: $4,213.54

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​​

​
"Hail impact damage to asphalt shingle roof at church property in Bartlett, Illinois documented during engineering evaluation."
 
​
 
🔎 The Carrier’s Position

The insurer acknowledged hail damage to certain soft metal components of the roofing system.

 

However, the carrier concluded that the asphalt shingle roof itself had not sustained functional hail damage.

​

Payment was issued in the amount of $4,213.54 for limited metal-related repairs.

The carrier maintained that the roofing system did not require replacement.

 
⚖️ The Dispute

The dispute centered on whether the asphalt shingles sustained functional hail damage.

 

A detailed inspection identified:

  • Impact marks consistent with hail strikes

  • Granule displacement

  • Surface bruising

  • Potential mat compromise in multiple slopes

 

The issue was not whether hail occurred — it was whether the damage extended beyond soft metals and materially affected the roofing system.

 
🧾 Our Approach

  • Retained an independent engineering professional to evaluate the roofing system

  • Conducted a joint inspection and documented shingle impacts

  • Submitted formal engineering findings supporting functional damage

  • Requested carrier engineering documentation for transparency

 

The carrier subsequently retained its own engineering consultant.

Despite repeated requests, the carrier declined to release its engineer’s report for review.

Following formal escalation and notice of potential regulatory complaint, the claim was reevaluated.

 
💰 Final Outcome

  • Initial Payment: $4,213.54

  • Final Settlement: $80,261.85

  • Result: Full asphalt shingle roof replacement approved

 

The dispute was ultimately resolved after further review of engineering findings and documentation.

 

The issue was not coverage — it was whether the extent of hail damage had been properly evaluated.

Denied/Delayed/Underpaid →

How we help policyholders with denied, delayed, or underpaid insurance claims in Illinois

 
Claims Process →

Step-by-step explanation of how the property insurance claim process works in Illinois

 
FAQ →

Answers to common questions about hiring a public adjuster and handling insurance claims

 
About Us →

Learn about Aegis Adjusters and our experience representing Illinois policyholders

 
Meet Our Team →

Meet our team of licensed public adjusters serving Illinois homeowners and businesses

bottom of page